Deepseek, Beanbag, Kimi, Bunshin Ichiban, which one is better? Which one is stupid?

1. DeepSeek

Advantage:
Logical Reasoning and Code Generation: excels in tasks requiring logical reasoning such as math problem solving and code generation, suitable for developers and academic research scenarios.

Low cost and open source: By optimizing the model structure and training cost, DeepSeek provides cost-effective services for SMEs and individual users.

Localized Deployment Support: Supports localized deployment, suitable for scenarios with high privacy and data security requirements.

Pros:
Insufficient multimodal capability: Currently, text processing is the mainstay, lacking multimodal capabilities such as image and speech.

2. Bean buns

Advantage:
Outstanding multimodal capability: Supports processing of text, image, speech and other modalities, especially excellent in image generation and real-time data integration.

Real-time data processing: with networking capabilities, it is able to obtain the latest data in real time (e.g., news, market dynamics), which is suitable for dynamic scenario applications.

Smooth voice interaction: high accuracy of voice recognition and support for multi-round dialog, suitable for intelligent customer service and daily voice assistant scenarios.

Pros:
Limited creative expression: in text generation that requires a high degree of creative thinking and emotional rendering, there is insufficient stylistic diversity and the content may appear monotonous.

High arithmetic demand: due to the need to process multiple modal data, the arithmetic demand is high, which may lead to an increase in cost.

Weak in long text processing: not as good as Kimi in long text architecture and information integration

3. A word from the heart of the text

Advantage:
Strong multi-tasking ability: excellent in multi-tasking scenarios such as text generation, summary generation, translation, etc., especially good at news release creation and daily conversations.

Multi-modal creation: supports the generation of text, images, audio and other modalities, and is able to organically integrate a variety of information to generate visually appealing content.

Intelligent voice interaction: performs well in smart home control and voice navigation scenarios, supporting smooth multi-round conversations.

Pros:
Insufficient specialized domain understanding: limited specialized understanding and depth of response in tasks requiring deep domain knowledge.

Limited quality of image generation: Although image generation is supported, there is still a gap with professional design software in terms of high precision and artistic expression.

4. Kimi

Advantage:
Strong long text processing capability: capable of processing 2 million words of text information at one time, suitable for long text reading, summary generation and data organization.

Sentiment analysis and text categorization: the ability to accurately capture emotional details and generate natural and compelling content.

Multimodal inference: supports joint training of text and images, with cross-modal inference capability, suitable for tasks involving multimodal data.

Pros:
Limited ability to structure long texts: As the length of a text grows, Kimi may have problems integrating and logically structuring the information, leading to a decline in the quality of long texts.

Slower generation: slower response time in image generation and complex task processing, affecting efficiency.

Insufficient depth of domain expertise: performance is not as accurate as other models when dealing with tasks that require deep domain knowledge.

Recommended Scenarios