Recent Purchases of DeepSeek All-in-Ones Note Infringement Risks of Using Dify

The ferment of the matter was a misuse of git to commit a PR for a Logo change to the main Dify release.

https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/16640 , while the official also briefly explains the commercial scope of the open source project , nothing more than LOGO and more rent two places do not modify .

With Dify in the domestic and international market awareness continues to rise, coupled with DeepSeek all-in-one machine fire, Dify as all-in-one flexible and configurable application layer products, favored by many "developers".

At the same time, modify the Dify project Logo and modified to multi-tenant basically become selling all-in-one regular operation, basically pure intranet use, resulting in Dify official difficult to trace.

Dify has been focusing on the knife DeepSeek all-in-one infringement issue for some time now, and has also hired a specialized team of lawyers to conduct anti-infringement lawsuits, and is known to have served lawyers' letters to a number of companies and individuals.

This time on the big score is Rejuveno Pharmaceuticals, after receiving an official letter from its lawyers:

A suspected Rejuveno Pharma employee thoughtfully sent a mass email to core developers:

Taking advantage of this matter, it is estimated that another wave of infringing developers will be caught violently, and it is hoped that the relevant manufacturers producing and selling all-in-one PCs will take the initiative to obtain DIfy commercial licenses, so as not to lose out on a small amount of money.